girl,dumped,radio girl dumped live on radio
posted by sl666
2 years 10 months 3 weeks ago • 2573 viewstags: girl, dumped, radio
Comments 
playlists with this video frakkin' funny by calvados
• "what's d problem?" To expect the awful by marinara
• Comedy I know and love by rottenseed
• Phunee by 12337
who voted for this video sl666
- WolfDemon
- James Roe
- BoneyD
- mlx
- Wargasm
- wildmanBill
- joedirt
- dodger
- LadyBug
- Krupo
- natemonster
- swampgirl
- Crazy-drummer
- transporter
- qruel
- HaricotVert
- Farhad2000
- calvados
- ILostMyPasswordRagarnok
- Baqueta
- Hex
- geo
- pho3n1x
- bizinichi
- southblvd
- archchef
- Laekroth
- messenger
- BicycleRepairMan
- r3574r7
- tcullum
- brendotroy
- Snoopy
- nibiyabi
- thecosmicshame
- Mooseman
- JSD
- Train_Tracks
- deputydog
- NickyP
- sroemerm
- DarkSavior
- batmanuel
- Constitutional_Patriot
- siftbot
x23
who voted against this video ant
- sbchapm
who has this post bookmarked kingsblood
Girl Dumped Live On Radio Related Videos
|
Top New Comedy Videos by Vote Top 15 Comedy Sifters of All Time 12. EDD
(9999 votes)Top 15 Comedy Sifters of the Past Week 14. ant
(84 votes)
Newest Appreciated Comments
| 
Stumble This
I REAAAALLLLLLY hope he wasn't wrong about his base cheating assumption on that one.
in terms of libel law, accusing a woman of being unchaste is particularly slanderous. so i suspect the lawyers at the radio station had reasonable evidence before they went ahead with this. well deserved, imho.
Also keep in mind that this is in the UK -- no country in the world comes even close to matching the US's litigiousness.
The first thing she asks after finding out it's an engagement ring is "how much is it worth?"
yeah, thats sad, I noticed that....
Apparently its been a bit debated this one, as the rules for *british radio require consent (you cannot just "pretend" to be someone else) so the offical line is (taken from http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?s=104a53275d8db2f172afd9fc2dafa272&t=532631&page=2)
Those people who said the whole thing was a fake are right on the money. I have received a letter from OFCOM. The relevant paragraph in their letter says.
'On this occasion, after obtaining a copy of the recording, the station informed us that the recipient of the call was not Angie but a member of staff who pretended to be her in a pre-recorded segment. While listeners would have been unaware of this at the time, as the 'real' Angie was not the recipient of the call we would be unable to consider a complaint about the call being unfair to her.'
so comedy *viral I guess now