Stumble This | You should also watch “Some old-school piracy” |
"From 1979, here is a story about video piracy called 'Who Stole Superman' from '60 Minutes'. Taped from KNXT-TV2, L.A"
Part 1 (you're watching it): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSfghe_B6Y4
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7j_C0yR21ZQ
Part 1 (you're watching it): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSfghe_B6Y4
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7j_C0yR21ZQ
I especially like how one of the guy the interview in one sentence says that nobody knows how much business they're losing and follows that up with an estimate of over 100 million dollars. That estimate is based on the idea that if piracy didn't exist they'd sell one film for every pirated movie there is. But I ask you, how likely is that estimate? Who can honestly say they would have purchased every movie they'd ever recorded/bought/borrowed if the piracy law had been successfully enforced?
Actually, many argue that the opposite is true of what this video says. If people see something they like they buy it, and if they've seen stuff they like from one source they're more likely to buy new the new stuff that source produces, it's not like people stop collecting films because they're available online.
New location of part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7j_C0yR21ZQ
But then, Hollywood itself was founded by pirates who moved to California to avoid having to pay Edison a licensing fee for using his film-projection technology.
Some things never change.
yo, it's dead ant!
Fixed.