..and 4 months later I come back to this thread to respond. xxovercastxx, the guy wrote an article where he puked out the same hilarious editorial that he presented in this video. That article does include one snippet of data, but it is totally irrelevant. It doesn't even come close to being grounds for his argument. Whether or not Hitchens is ultimately right, his argument, as presented here or in Vanityfair, is not valid. As to whether 'data' have to be "scientific," I don't care... any evidence to back up the guy's blabbering would help.
The reason that I made the comment in the first place is that I'm irritated when people see someone shooting their mouth off in a reputable source, like Vanityfair or VideoSift, and then take what they are saying as fact. An editorial in a magazine is not fact; it is not a source; it is not evidence for anything! It would be clear that Hitchens has no relevant "data", if the reader/viewer just took a second to be critical of what he is saying.
Perhaps you weren't paying enough attention because he wrote a fucking article on the topic. That's spawned the current Who says women aren't funny? article which in turn spawned this video response.
Being too lazy to go read them doesn't mean nobody has presented an argument.
Drugs + Reality TV.
Dumb blonde girl
JFK - Ich Bin Ein Berliner speech, June 26 1963
Making iced tea the creepy way
Christopher Hitchens - Why Women aren't funny
xxovercastxx, the guy wrote an article where he puked out the same hilarious editorial that he presented in this video. That article does include one snippet of data, but it is totally irrelevant. It doesn't even come close to being grounds for his argument. Whether or not Hitchens is ultimately right, his argument, as presented here or in Vanityfair, is not valid.
As to whether 'data' have to be "scientific," I don't care... any evidence to back up the guy's blabbering would help.
The reason that I made the comment in the first place is that I'm irritated when people see someone shooting their mouth off in a reputable source, like Vanityfair or VideoSift, and then take what they are saying as fact. An editorial in a magazine is not fact; it is not a source; it is not evidence for anything! It would be clear that Hitchens has no relevant "data", if the reader/viewer just took a second to be critical of what he is saying.
..and thanks for calling me lazy.
>> ^xxovercastxx:
Perhaps you weren't paying enough attention because he wrote a fucking article on the topic. That's spawned the current Who says women aren't funny? article which in turn spawned this video response.
Being too lazy to go read them doesn't mean nobody has presented an argument.
Idiot Judge Says "Black Hole" is Racist
Shuttle Launch from Commercial Flight
...would have been more exciting if it were a surface to air missile.
Still pretty neat though.
Hugh Laurie Was Not Always Cool... (4 Seconds)
Girl with frogs in her pants.
If there were ever a perfect time for a roof to collapse...
Jenna Jameson on O'Reilly talks about Feminism and Porn
Optical illusion - Negative afterimage
http://www.videosift.com/video/Castle-Color-Illusion
The Bystander Effect: Genovese Syndrome
More QVC live TV goodness.
..sorry, but no.
Small Fearless Dog Annoying Moose
Nice soundtrack-sounds like Stan Getz and Duke Ellington....songs take th' A-Train-
Correct. it's a cut off of Jazz Goes to College (1954).