Quick Options

NSFW Content:
Listing Mode:
Coloring Style:
Animations:

◀ Quick Options    Login    Register
X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
Recent Comments by demon_ix subscribe to this feed

HaricotVert (Member Profile)
Oh, I see. Never mind then

In reply to this comment by HaricotVert:
Yeah I know, but it doesn't matter, since I don't have the necessary privelege for it to actually be invoked even if I did type it * dupeof...


written by demon_ix  | 13 minutes 34 seconds ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

"An internal server error occurred. Please try again later." (Sift Talk Post)
Well, robots.txt doesn't mean Google won't crawl VS, ant, it just lets you define stuff for it not to scan, etc.

A better way to go at Googlebot is through the Webmaster Tools that let you define how often Googlebot will scan your site, and also submit sitemaps, etc.


written by demon_ix  | 6 hours 59 minutes 31 seconds ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)

Google Webstation: 7 inches of gadget lust
Doesn't seem very comfortable or useful. The battery wouldn't last long either, with video playing like that over a 3G connection.


written by demon_ix  | 7 hours 58 minutes 53 seconds ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

wolfie (Member Profile)
Your video was a dupe, I'm afraid. Held the #1 spot for quite a while, too, so good taste!

http://www.videosift.com/video/Truckers-Delight -> http://www.videosift.com/video/FLAIRS-TRUCKERS-DELIGHT


written by demon_ix  | 8 hours 30 minutes 41 seconds ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

d3bas3r (Member Profile)
Your post, while full of Neil Degrasse Tyson and combined with Richard Dawkins awesomeness, was a dupe

http://www.videosift.com/video/Neil-Tyson-rebukes-Richard-Dawkins -> http://www.videosift.com/video/Why-hasnt-Richard-Dawkins-converted-more-Atheists

Keep at it!


written by demon_ix  | 8 hours 32 minutes 40 seconds ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

Truckers Delight.
*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/FLAIRS-TRUCKERS-DELIGHT


written by demon_ix  | 8 hours 36 minutes 7 seconds ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

The Daily Show Lou Dobbs Extended Interview Pt. 1(of 3)
Oh, and *return.


written by demon_ix  | 8 hours 40 minutes 17 seconds ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

The Daily Show Lou Dobbs Extended Interview Pt. 1(of 3)
Well, a better way is to dupeof the video. What I actually wanted with this discussion was to "decide" on a way to deal with multi-part posts, but I guess there's no real reason not to keep all three. I'll my video description accordingly.


written by demon_ix  | 8 hours 42 minutes 41 seconds ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

Pink Floyd - Astronomy Domine - 1968
Nick Mason had his look figured out back then, I see


written by demon_ix  | 9 hours 5 minutes 3 seconds ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)

HaricotVert (Member Profile)
It's '*dupeof=', not '*dupe of'

In reply to this comment by HaricotVert:
dupe of http://www.videosift.com/video/Why-hasnt-Richard-Dawkins-converted-more-Atheists


written by demon_ix  | 9 hours 14 minutes 37 seconds ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

Why hasn't Richard Dawkins converted more Atheists?
*quality, for SlipperyPete


written by demon_ix  | 9 hours 15 minutes 6 seconds ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)

Neil Tyson rebukes Richard Dawkins
Almost, HaricotVert. It's dupeof=, not dupe of

*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Why-hasnt-Richard-Dawkins-converted-more-Atheists


written by demon_ix  | 9 hours 15 minutes 29 seconds ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

The Daily Show Lou Dobbs Extended Interview Pt. 1(of 3)
This post is a little complicated.
This is part 1 of the Lou Dobbs interview. Parts 2 and 3 from mxxcon are in the video description.

This video was already sifted by me ( http://www.videosift.com/video/TDS-Jon-Stewart-And-Lou-Dobbs-Extended-Interview ), and since I felt all three were essentially the same post, I just linked to them from the description and didn't bother to submit them as well.

Anyway, not sure how to proceed here, and I can't dupeof to myself anyway. Either all three are part of the same sift and should be dupeof/discarded, or parts 2/3 should be allowed to remain. Let's *discuss.


written by demon_ix  | 9 hours 28 minutes 55 seconds ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

Bryce, Brycewi19 got his ruby - baby (Happy Talk Post)
Gz Bryce! Excellent work!


written by demon_ix  | 11 hours 25 minutes 51 seconds ago | CH
 4  | flag spam (0)

gwiz665 (Member Profile)
RUDE!

In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
http://www.videosift.com/video/CURSES


written by demon_ix  | 1 day 9 hours 8 minutes ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)

CURSES!!
Thief!!!!!!!!


Upvote, though


written by demon_ix  | 1 day 9 hours 9 minutes ago | CH
 1  | flag spam (0)

Oprah Announces Canceling Show
Because once you've interviewed Sarah Palin, it's never the same.


written by demon_ix  | 1 day 18 hours 41 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

Tall Dog vs. Tall Dog From The Tonight Show w. Conan O'Brien
I think Titan was just asking for some buttsecks.

Either way, I was hoping for the BigDog


written by demon_ix  | 1 day 18 hours 49 minutes ago | CH
 0  | flag spam (0)

Sarah Palin Fans: Not That Bright
What? You mean the opinions we hear on TV aren't always based on fact?!? GLENN BECK, WHAT SHOULD WE DO NEXT?!?


written by demon_ix  | 1 day 19 hours ago | CH
 2  | flag spam (0)

Couple Arrested for Not Paying Tip
>> ^blankfist:
Better wages wouldn't really work in the food industry. It's a tough racket, and restauranteurs typically couldn't afford to pay the wait staff minimum wage. And raising the menu prices would mean less customers and eventually less customers eating out.

>> ^blankfist:
That aside, when these customers sat down to order they agreed to the mandatory tip.


In my view, when the restaurant adds a compulsory 18% increase to the menu price but doesn't put that on the menu so that the prices seem cheaper, it's nothing short of fraud, even if every single restaurant out there does the same. It's all right to defend the plight of the restaurant owner who adds an oxymoronic mandatory gratuity, but when you purposefully hide the added cost on the menu, you're not exactly innocent.


>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
...when you exchange money for a product, and then consume the product, you shouldn't have a right to a discount or refund just because you didn't like the product or how it was served...

Also, if a tip becomes mandatory, then it isn't really a tip anymore, it's part of the agreed-upon cost.



How are you not entitled to an opinion of the product you received? If a gratuity is included in the bill, that implies that the service itself is a product. The same point I made to blankfist applies here, imo. If you bill the customer for the service but hide it from the menu cost of the food, why is it assumed that the customer knows about the 18% gratuity before receiving the bill? Is there a big sign at the entrance saying "18% mandatory gratuity. Beware, all ye who enter here"?


My main point has already been made by others. If you make something mandatory, it's no longer a tip or a gratuity, even if you call it that.


written by demon_ix  | 1 day 19 hours 32 minutes ago | CH
 8  | flag spam (0)
comment listing type:
Friends O' the Sift
Top 15 Comedy Sifters of All Time
1. Zifnab  (36833 votes)
2. dystopianfuturetoday  (23022 votes)
3. rasch187  (19391 votes)
4. blankfist  (19211 votes)
5. arvana  (18633 votes)
6. kronosposeidon  (17081 votes)
7. eric3579  (15419 votes)
8. Zonbie  (11670 votes)
9. NetRunner  (10159 votes)
10. Issykitty  (10118 votes)
11. dotdude  (10038 votes)
12. EDD  (9951 votes)
13. MikesHL13  (9456 votes)
14. theaceofclubz  (9291 votes)
15. alien_concept  (9260 votes)
Top 15 Comedy Sifters of the Past Week
1. rasch187  (258 votes)
2. brycewi19  (256 votes)
3. dystopianfuturetoday  (159 votes)
4. kronosposeidon  (132 votes)
5. Kevlar  (122 votes)
6. reiwan  (110 votes)
7. lore_weaver  (107 votes)
8. mrsid  (107 votes)
9. Zifnab  (101 votes)
10. Duckman33  (94 votes)
11. KnivesOut  (93 votes)
12. ant  (93 votes)
13. demon_ix  (90 votes)
14. Sagemind  (82 votes)
15. MikesHL13  (81 votes)